<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 411 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the addition related to compensation for project delays and allowing the disputed expenditure. The treatment of liquidated damages as capital receipts was upheld, leading to the allowance of both appeals for the respective assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:29:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 411 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the addition related to compensation for project delays and allowing the disputed expenditure. The treatment of liquidated damages as capital receipts was upheld, leading to the allowance of both appeals for the respective assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>