<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 404 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings due to invalid jurisdiction assumption, incorrect facts assumption, lack of inquiry by the Assessing Officer, and mechanical approval by the sanctioning authority. The addition of commission income in the minor assessee&#039;s hands was deemed unjustified. The reassessment was declared void, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 404 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings due to invalid jurisdiction assumption, incorrect facts assumption, lack of inquiry by the Assessing Officer, and mechanical approval by the sanctioning authority. The addition of commission income in the minor assessee&#039;s hands was deemed unjustified. The reassessment was declared void, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>