<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2224 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298631</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and dismissed all appeals by the Revenue, ruling that the expenditure on lease premises should be classified as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal found that the expenditure was for the business purposes of the assessees and not for acquiring a capital asset, referencing precedents and judgments to support its conclusion. The judgment was issued on 12th July 2018 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2224 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298631</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and dismissed all appeals by the Revenue, ruling that the expenditure on lease premises should be classified as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal found that the expenditure was for the business purposes of the assessees and not for acquiring a capital asset, referencing precedents and judgments to support its conclusion. The judgment was issued on 12th July 2018 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>