<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1977 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee as the assessment was quashed due to the invalid Notice issued under Section 143(2) beyond the limitation period. The Tribunal held that the assessment was bad in law for want of jurisdiction based on the Delhi Special Bench decision in Rajkumar Chawla &amp;amp; Others Vs. ITO. The other grounds raised by the assessee regarding the validity of assessments framed under Section 143(3) and Notice issued under Section 142(1) were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1977 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee as the assessment was quashed due to the invalid Notice issued under Section 143(2) beyond the limitation period. The Tribunal held that the assessment was bad in law for want of jurisdiction based on the Delhi Special Bench decision in Rajkumar Chawla &amp;amp; Others Vs. ITO. The other grounds raised by the assessee regarding the validity of assessments framed under Section 143(3) and Notice issued under Section 142(1) were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>