https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298629 The court upheld the lower courts' decisions in a criminal revision petition challenging a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner's arguments regarding the misuse of a blank cheque and failure to prove issuance to Perumal were rejected. The court emphasized the burden on the accused to rebut the presumption under section 139 of the Act and dismissed discrepancies in evidence. Ultimately, the court found no illegality in the lower courts' orders, affirming that the cheque was issued for consideration, underscoring the importance of substantiating claims and addressing evidence contradictions in such cases. en-us Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298629 The court upheld the lower courts' decisions in a criminal revision petition challenging a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner's arguments regarding the misuse of a blank cheque and failure to prove issuance to Perumal were rejected. The court emphasized the burden on the accused to rebut the presumption under section 139 of the Act and dismissed discrepancies in evidence. Ultimately, the court found no illegality in the lower courts' orders, affirming that the cheque was issued for consideration, underscoring the importance of substantiating claims and addressing evidence contradictions in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298629