<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1469 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order of the CIT(A) for AY 2009-10, as it violated principles of natural justice by not ensuring proper service of notice to the assessee. The CIT(A) failed to adjudicate all grounds raised by the assessee, breaching procedural fairness. Legal precedents were cited to support the decision to set aside the CIT(A) order and remand the case for fresh adjudication with a proper opportunity for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:27:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1469 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order of the CIT(A) for AY 2009-10, as it violated principles of natural justice by not ensuring proper service of notice to the assessee. The CIT(A) failed to adjudicate all grounds raised by the assessee, breaching procedural fairness. Legal precedents were cited to support the decision to set aside the CIT(A) order and remand the case for fresh adjudication with a proper opportunity for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>