https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298651 A plaint is liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11 when, on a meaningful reading of the plaint alone, it discloses no cause of action or is barred by statute. Applied here, the suit property did not appear in the 1962 published list of wakf properties, and any challenge to omission from that list had to be pursued within the prescribed statutory period under wakf law. As no timely action was taken by the competent Board, the belated suit disclosed no enforceable right to sue and was barred by the statutory scheme. The Supreme Court therefore restored the Tribunal's rejection of the plaint and set aside the High Court's contrary order. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:27:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298651 A plaint is liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11 when, on a meaningful reading of the plaint alone, it discloses no cause of action or is barred by statute. Applied here, the suit property did not appear in the 1962 published list of wakf properties, and any challenge to omission from that list had to be pursued within the prescribed statutory period under wakf law. As no timely action was taken by the competent Board, the belated suit disclosed no enforceable right to sue and was barred by the statutory scheme. The Supreme Court therefore restored the Tribunal's rejection of the plaint and set aside the High Court's contrary order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298651