https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298650 A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 only when, reading the plaint as a whole and accepting its averments as true, it ex facie discloses no cause of action or an apparent bar of law. On that standard, the plaints were not liable to rejection because the pleadings did not any clear limitation bar and were stated to be filed within time from the date of knowledge. The suits also were not treated as benami claims; they sought declaration of title, recovery of possession and consequential reliefs, so the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act did not justify threshold rejection. The rejection order was set aside and the suits were directed to proceed to trial. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:27:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298650 A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 only when, reading the plaint as a whole and accepting its averments as true, it ex facie discloses no cause of action or an apparent bar of law. On that standard, the plaints were not liable to rejection because the pleadings did not any clear limitation bar and were stated to be filed within time from the date of knowledge. The suits also were not treated as benami claims; they sought declaration of title, recovery of possession and consequential reliefs, so the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act did not justify threshold rejection. The rejection order was set aside and the suits were directed to proceed to trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298650