<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1933 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298648</link>
    <description>Binding precedent was applied to conclude that no substantive question survived for consideration in the Special Leave Petitions and Civil Appeal. The Court treated the earlier decision in Union of India v. DSCL Sugar Ltd. as controlling and dispositive, leaving no separate issue requiring adjudication in the present proceedings. On that basis, the Special Leave Petitions and the Civil Appeal were dismissed and the matters stood disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1933 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298648</link>
      <description>Binding precedent was applied to conclude that no substantive question survived for consideration in the Special Leave Petitions and Civil Appeal. The Court treated the earlier decision in Union of India v. DSCL Sugar Ltd. as controlling and dispositive, leaving no separate issue requiring adjudication in the present proceedings. On that basis, the Special Leave Petitions and the Civil Appeal were dismissed and the matters stood disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>