https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298643 Fresh consideration of bail is required after filing of the charge sheet, and a subsequent application cannot be rejected solely because bail was earlier refused without examining the new prosecution material. The note states that the Court assessed the charge-sheet record, including the CCTV extract and the limited role attributed to the petitioner, and treated the earlier order as having misread precedent and failed to consider the evidence. It also rejected the assumption that the petitioner would misuse influence because of family connections. Applying the presumption of innocence, parity with a co-accused, and the material then available, the Court concluded that continued custody was not justified and that the ingredients of Section 307 IPC were not made out against the petitioner. en-us Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:27:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298643 Fresh consideration of bail is required after filing of the charge sheet, and a subsequent application cannot be rejected solely because bail was earlier refused without examining the new prosecution material. The note states that the Court assessed the charge-sheet record, including the CCTV extract and the limited role attributed to the petitioner, and treated the earlier order as having misread precedent and failed to consider the evidence. It also rejected the assumption that the petitioner would misuse influence because of family connections. Applying the presumption of innocence, parity with a co-accused, and the material then available, the Court concluded that continued custody was not justified and that the ingredients of Section 307 IPC were not made out against the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298643