<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1321 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298640</link>
    <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was granted pending trial because the investigation was complete, the charge-sheet had been filed, and there was no material showing tampering with evidence, influence over witnesses, or a real risk of absconding. The court reiterated that bail secures the accused&#039;s presence at trial and that pre-conviction detention is not punitive; seriousness of the accusation alone is not enough to refuse bail. Prior custody and the availability of restrictive conditions were also relevant, and bail was allowed on conditions intended to secure attendance and prevent interference with the trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1321 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298640</link>
      <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was granted pending trial because the investigation was complete, the charge-sheet had been filed, and there was no material showing tampering with evidence, influence over witnesses, or a real risk of absconding. The court reiterated that bail secures the accused&#039;s presence at trial and that pre-conviction detention is not punitive; seriousness of the accusation alone is not enough to refuse bail. Prior custody and the availability of restrictive conditions were also relevant, and bail was allowed on conditions intended to secure attendance and prevent interference with the trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>