<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1245 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298658</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal directed the inclusion of the Corporate Debtor through the Interim Resolution Professional as Respondent No. 2 in a case involving a stay on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to a preexisting dispute. The tribunal ordered the handover of the corporate debtor&#039;s assets and records to the IRP, allowing the IRP to operate the company&#039;s bank accounts for essential functions. The tribunal emphasized adherence to the time-bound procedures under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the need to avoid delays that could hinder the IBC&#039;s objectives, while also highlighting the importance of further examination regarding the nature of a dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:27:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1245 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298658</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal directed the inclusion of the Corporate Debtor through the Interim Resolution Professional as Respondent No. 2 in a case involving a stay on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to a preexisting dispute. The tribunal ordered the handover of the corporate debtor&#039;s assets and records to the IRP, allowing the IRP to operate the company&#039;s bank accounts for essential functions. The tribunal emphasized adherence to the time-bound procedures under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the need to avoid delays that could hinder the IBC&#039;s objectives, while also highlighting the importance of further examination regarding the nature of a dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>