<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1934 (7) TMI 17 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298620</link>
    <description>In an appeal against acquittal on facts, the appellate court may reappraise the entire evidence and reverse the acquittal where the record justifies that course. The Criminal Procedure Code confers a right of appeal against acquittal and does not impose a special limitation restricting interference only to perversity, incompetence, or glaring miscarriage of justice. That power, however, must be exercised with due regard to the trial judge&#039;s advantage in seeing witnesses, the presumption of innocence, and the accused&#039;s entitlement to the benefit of doubt. The stated principle sustained the High Court&#039;s conviction in principle, and the accused&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:17:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1934 (7) TMI 17 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298620</link>
      <description>In an appeal against acquittal on facts, the appellate court may reappraise the entire evidence and reverse the acquittal where the record justifies that course. The Criminal Procedure Code confers a right of appeal against acquittal and does not impose a special limitation restricting interference only to perversity, incompetence, or glaring miscarriage of justice. That power, however, must be exercised with due regard to the trial judge&#039;s advantage in seeing witnesses, the presumption of innocence, and the accused&#039;s entitlement to the benefit of doubt. The stated principle sustained the High Court&#039;s conviction in principle, and the accused&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1934 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>