https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298617 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only when substantial and compelling reasons exist on a reliable evidentiary basis, because the presumption of innocence is reinforced by acquittal. The record showed serious infirmities in the prosecution case, including doubtful witness credibility, material omissions, and an unsatisfactory account of the alleged injuries, while the surrounding circumstances also supported the possibility that the accused acted in self-defence in a land-possession dispute. On that basis, the conviction and sentences could not be sustained, and the appellants were acquitted of all charges. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298617 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only when substantial and compelling reasons exist on a reliable evidentiary basis, because the presumption of innocence is reinforced by acquittal. The record showed serious infirmities in the prosecution case, including doubtful witness credibility, material omissions, and an unsatisfactory account of the alleged injuries, while the surrounding circumstances also supported the possibility that the accused acted in self-defence in a land-possession dispute. On that basis, the conviction and sentences could not be sustained, and the appellants were acquitted of all charges. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Dec 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298617