https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298613 Anticipatory bail was considered where the only material against the applicant was a co-accused's disclosure statement. The Court noted that a person named in such a disclosure may be interrogated, but custody is not justified unless independent incriminating material exists beyond that statement. As no evidence apart from the disclosure had been collected, and the applicant had local roots, stable employment, first-offender status, and no real risk of absconding, anticipatory bail was granted. en-us Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:29:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298613 Anticipatory bail was considered where the only material against the applicant was a co-accused's disclosure statement. The Court noted that a person named in such a disclosure may be interrogated, but custody is not justified unless independent incriminating material exists beyond that statement. As no evidence apart from the disclosure had been collected, and the applicant had local roots, stable employment, first-offender status, and no real risk of absconding, anticipatory bail was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298613