<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 16 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27088</link>
    <description>Renewal of a statutory appointment under the Estate Duty Act depended on satisfaction of prescribed qualifications and experience on objective facts, making the decision open to judicial scrutiny. Vague and general reasons, unsupported by the record, could not justify an adverse inference that the petitioner lacked competence in the relevant fields. The authorities also failed to give a proper opportunity to meet the material relied upon against him, so the refusal was unsustainable, was set aside, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:13:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 16 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27088</link>
      <description>Renewal of a statutory appointment under the Estate Duty Act depended on satisfaction of prescribed qualifications and experience on objective facts, making the decision open to judicial scrutiny. Vague and general reasons, unsupported by the record, could not justify an adverse inference that the petitioner lacked competence in the relevant fields. The authorities also failed to give a proper opportunity to meet the material relied upon against him, so the refusal was unsustainable, was set aside, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>