<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1976 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298609</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal, stating the assessment order under Section 144 was invalid due to jurisdictional issues. The tribunal emphasized the absence of a valid notice for initiating proceedings under Section 147 by the Assessing Officer who framed the assessment, rendering the assessment order void. Legal principles and precedents highlighting the significance of jurisdiction in assessment proceedings were considered in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1976 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298609</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal, stating the assessment order under Section 144 was invalid due to jurisdictional issues. The tribunal emphasized the absence of a valid notice for initiating proceedings under Section 147 by the Assessing Officer who framed the assessment, rendering the assessment order void. Legal principles and precedents highlighting the significance of jurisdiction in assessment proceedings were considered in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>