<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1864 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298608</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80IB(10) depended on factual verification of the residential units&#039; built-up area, including treatment of common area and merged units. The Assessing Officer questioned whether the flats exceeded the statutory limit, and the assessee then filed a revised return withdrawing the claim. Because the revised return was filed within limitation and treated as valid, the assessment proceeded on that basis. The assessee could not revive the deduction before the appellate authority without first disproving the factual foundation for the withdrawal, and the principle allowing a fresh legal claim at the appellate stage did not apply where factual investigation was required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1864 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298608</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80IB(10) depended on factual verification of the residential units&#039; built-up area, including treatment of common area and merged units. The Assessing Officer questioned whether the flats exceeded the statutory limit, and the assessee then filed a revised return withdrawing the claim. Because the revised return was filed within limitation and treated as valid, the assessment proceeded on that basis. The assessee could not revive the deduction before the appellate authority without first disproving the factual foundation for the withdrawal, and the principle allowing a fresh legal claim at the appellate stage did not apply where factual investigation was required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>