<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 819 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298604</link>
    <description>Section 167(2) CrPC confers an indefeasible right to statutory bail when investigation is not completed within the prescribed period and the accused is ready to furnish bail. That right is not defeated by filing an incomplete or piecemeal charge-sheet, because the prosecution cannot split one investigation into separate reports to avoid default under Section 167(2). A partial final report filed within time for only one allegation did not cure the failure to complete investigation on the remaining offences, and Section 173(8) on further investigation does not validate such a report for denying default bail. The petitioner was therefore entitled to be enlarged on bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 819 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298604</link>
      <description>Section 167(2) CrPC confers an indefeasible right to statutory bail when investigation is not completed within the prescribed period and the accused is ready to furnish bail. That right is not defeated by filing an incomplete or piecemeal charge-sheet, because the prosecution cannot split one investigation into separate reports to avoid default under Section 167(2). A partial final report filed within time for only one allegation did not cure the failure to complete investigation on the remaining offences, and Section 173(8) on further investigation does not validate such a report for denying default bail. The petitioner was therefore entitled to be enlarged on bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>