<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1528 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298603</link>
    <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the respondent in a case involving dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 by casting doubt on the existence of a legally enforceable debt. Due to the lack of corroborative evidence and inconsistencies in the petitioner&#039;s account, the court dismissed the revision, ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1528 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298603</link>
      <description>The court upheld the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the respondent in a case involving dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139 by casting doubt on the existence of a legally enforceable debt. Due to the lack of corroborative evidence and inconsistencies in the petitioner&#039;s account, the court dismissed the revision, ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>