<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 654 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298600</link>
    <description>Bail assessment requires an independent evaluation of the prima facie accusation, the nature of alleged criminal intimidation, and whether continued detention remains justified. A threat should disclose material capable of causing alarm and indicate a real and immediate risk of death or grievous hurt to support the graver form of criminal intimidation. Rejection of a repeat bail application solely because an earlier application was dismissed on merits is improper; the court must reassess the relevant facts and detention justification. On the stated facts, the absence of clear material showing alarm or an immediate serious threat supported release on bond and surety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 654 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298600</link>
      <description>Bail assessment requires an independent evaluation of the prima facie accusation, the nature of alleged criminal intimidation, and whether continued detention remains justified. A threat should disclose material capable of causing alarm and indicate a real and immediate risk of death or grievous hurt to support the graver form of criminal intimidation. Rejection of a repeat bail application solely because an earlier application was dismissed on merits is improper; the court must reassess the relevant facts and detention justification. On the stated facts, the absence of clear material showing alarm or an immediate serious threat supported release on bond and surety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>