<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1149 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298598</link>
    <description>Section 482 CrPC may be invoked sparingly to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice, and quashing is appropriate where the allegations, taken at face value, do not disclose the offence or where the prosecution is oppressive or vexatious. Applying that standard, the complaint contained no specific allegations against the appellants, the material showed they had been living at different places for long periods, and the cruelty and harassment claims were unsupported by any connecting evidence. The complaint and summoning order were therefore liable to be quashed insofar as they concerned the appellants, and the High Court&#039;s refusal to interfere was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1149 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298598</link>
      <description>Section 482 CrPC may be invoked sparingly to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice, and quashing is appropriate where the allegations, taken at face value, do not disclose the offence or where the prosecution is oppressive or vexatious. Applying that standard, the complaint contained no specific allegations against the appellants, the material showed they had been living at different places for long periods, and the cruelty and harassment claims were unsupported by any connecting evidence. The complaint and summoning order were therefore liable to be quashed insofar as they concerned the appellants, and the High Court&#039;s refusal to interfere was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>