https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414573 The High Court of Madras set aside the impugned orders due to the lack of personal hearing for the writ petitioner as mandated by Section 75(4) of the TN-GST Act. The court emphasized the necessity of personal hearings for procedural fairness and compliance with legal provisions. Both parties agreed to a scheduled personal hearing, and the respondent was directed to re-examine the legal aspects and make a decision within four weeks. The court disposed of the Writ Petitions with outlined directives, without cost orders, clarifying that the decision did not reflect an opinion on the case merits. en-us Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414573 The High Court of Madras set aside the impugned orders due to the lack of personal hearing for the writ petitioner as mandated by Section 75(4) of the TN-GST Act. The court emphasized the necessity of personal hearings for procedural fairness and compliance with legal provisions. Both parties agreed to a scheduled personal hearing, and the respondent was directed to re-examine the legal aspects and make a decision within four weeks. The court disposed of the Writ Petitions with outlined directives, without cost orders, clarifying that the decision did not reflect an opinion on the case merits. Case-Laws GST Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414573