<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 353 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414572</link>
    <description>The court allowed the applications to prepone the main cases to be heard on the same day due to common facts. The court dismissed the petitions seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in two complaint cases under the CGST Act, 2017, stating that custodial interrogation was necessary to investigate the petitioner&#039;s actions and involvement in a significant GST fraud scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 353 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414572</link>
      <description>The court allowed the applications to prepone the main cases to be heard on the same day due to common facts. The court dismissed the petitions seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner in two complaint cases under the CGST Act, 2017, stating that custodial interrogation was necessary to investigate the petitioner&#039;s actions and involvement in a significant GST fraud scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>