<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 350 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order that deleted the proportionate disallowance of expenses. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s disallowance was based on an incorrect understanding of the expenses and the additional income admitted during the survey. It concluded that the expenses were legitimate business expenses, and there was no evidence of them being inflated or non-genuine. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 350 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order that deleted the proportionate disallowance of expenses. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s disallowance was based on an incorrect understanding of the expenses and the additional income admitted during the survey. It concluded that the expenses were legitimate business expenses, and there was no evidence of them being inflated or non-genuine. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>