<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 344 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414563</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against a Look Out Circular after noting that the challenge was confined to the circular, the investigating agency already knew the petitioner&#039;s addresses, no summons service was denied, and there was no allegation of non-cooperation. It also noted that under the applicable Office Memorandum a Look Out Circular is valid for one year unless renewed, and no renewal was shown for the circular issued on 08.07.2019, supporting prima facie automatic removal. The petitioner&#039;s medical condition and the incomplete stage of adjudication were also taken into account. The operation, execution and implementation of the circular were stayed until the next hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 344 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414563</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against a Look Out Circular after noting that the challenge was confined to the circular, the investigating agency already knew the petitioner&#039;s addresses, no summons service was denied, and there was no allegation of non-cooperation. It also noted that under the applicable Office Memorandum a Look Out Circular is valid for one year unless renewed, and no renewal was shown for the circular issued on 08.07.2019, supporting prima facie automatic removal. The petitioner&#039;s medical condition and the incomplete stage of adjudication were also taken into account. The operation, execution and implementation of the circular were stayed until the next hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>