<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 342 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order as the show cause notice by the Additional Director General, DRI, lacked jurisdiction. Consequently, all related proceedings, including those for confiscation and penalty under section 124, were deemed invalid. The appeal was allowed on 09.11.2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 342 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order as the show cause notice by the Additional Director General, DRI, lacked jurisdiction. Consequently, all related proceedings, including those for confiscation and penalty under section 124, were deemed invalid. The appeal was allowed on 09.11.2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>