<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 339 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414558</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant in the case concerning the liability to reverse Cenvat credit under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the period 2011-12 to 2014-15. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Department&#039;s calculation, noting that the demand exceeded the actual Cenvat credit availed by the Appellant. It was concluded that the Department&#039;s demand lacked legal basis and justification for the extended period of limitation. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand and providing consequential relief to the Appellant in accordance with legal provisions and established judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:44:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 339 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414558</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant in the case concerning the liability to reverse Cenvat credit under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the period 2011-12 to 2014-15. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Department&#039;s calculation, noting that the demand exceeded the actual Cenvat credit availed by the Appellant. It was concluded that the Department&#039;s demand lacked legal basis and justification for the extended period of limitation. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand and providing consequential relief to the Appellant in accordance with legal provisions and established judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>