<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1231 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298584</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of disallowances on labor charges, sundry creditors, and transport charges. Emphasizing the need to invoke section 145(3) and identify specific defects before making adhoc disallowances, the ITAT reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The appeal was granted, and the order was pronounced on 01.06.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 21:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1231 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298584</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of disallowances on labor charges, sundry creditors, and transport charges. Emphasizing the need to invoke section 145(3) and identify specific defects before making adhoc disallowances, the ITAT reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The appeal was granted, and the order was pronounced on 01.06.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>