<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2061 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298590</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka held that interest on overdue receivables, when not recovered within the stipulated time, is not a separate international transaction but an integral part of the main sale transaction to the Associated Enterprise. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, treating the appeal as partly allowed for statistical purposes. In a separate case, the Court emphasized that appeals under section 260A are not maintainable unless there is evident perversity in the ITAT&#039;s findings. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, stressing the need for consistent parameters in assessing appeals. The present appeal by the Appellants-Revenue was dismissed, with no costs imposed, as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 21:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2061 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298590</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka held that interest on overdue receivables, when not recovered within the stipulated time, is not a separate international transaction but an integral part of the main sale transaction to the Associated Enterprise. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, treating the appeal as partly allowed for statistical purposes. In a separate case, the Court emphasized that appeals under section 260A are not maintainable unless there is evident perversity in the ITAT&#039;s findings. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, stressing the need for consistent parameters in assessing appeals. The present appeal by the Appellants-Revenue was dismissed, with no costs imposed, as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>