<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 568 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298576</link>
    <description>Sole proprietorship status does not defeat a cheque-dishonour complaint merely because the proprietary concern&#039;s trading name is omitted: the proprietor and concern are not separate juristic persons, so proceedings in the proprietor&#039;s personal name are competent. Admission of cheque issuance, correlation between supplied goods and invoice-matched cheques, and an unrebutted presumption of consideration support a legally enforceable debt. The drawer&#039;s signature, rather than authorship of the cheque&#039;s body, is material. Dispatch of statutory notice by registered post to the correct address, supported by posting and acknowledgment evidence and surrounding circumstances, permits an inference of service. These elements satisfy the requirements for cheque dishonour liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:53:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 568 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298576</link>
      <description>Sole proprietorship status does not defeat a cheque-dishonour complaint merely because the proprietary concern&#039;s trading name is omitted: the proprietor and concern are not separate juristic persons, so proceedings in the proprietor&#039;s personal name are competent. Admission of cheque issuance, correlation between supplied goods and invoice-matched cheques, and an unrebutted presumption of consideration support a legally enforceable debt. The drawer&#039;s signature, rather than authorship of the cheque&#039;s body, is material. Dispatch of statutory notice by registered post to the correct address, supported by posting and acknowledgment evidence and surrounding circumstances, permits an inference of service. These elements satisfy the requirements for cheque dishonour liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>