<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 334 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414553</link>
    <description>Default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure arises when investigation is not completed and the challan is not filed within the prescribed period, and the right is statutory and indefeasible. The Punjab and Haryana High Court distinguished this right from regular bail under Sections 437, 438 and 439, holding that conditions attached to default bail cannot frustrate its exercise. Onerous monetary requirements, including a substantial cash bond, multiple sureties and a bank guarantee/FDR linked to the alleged amount, were impermissible. The Court set aside those conditions and modified the default bail order in favour of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 334 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414553</link>
      <description>Default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure arises when investigation is not completed and the challan is not filed within the prescribed period, and the right is statutory and indefeasible. The Punjab and Haryana High Court distinguished this right from regular bail under Sections 437, 438 and 439, holding that conditions attached to default bail cannot frustrate its exercise. Onerous monetary requirements, including a substantial cash bond, multiple sureties and a bank guarantee/FDR linked to the alleged amount, were impermissible. The Court set aside those conditions and modified the default bail order in favour of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>