<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 330 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414549</link>
    <description>The court upheld the imposition of the penalty under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that the pendency of an appeal against the assessment order did not preclude initiating penalty proceedings. The court highlighted the availability of statutory remedies for challenging the penalty and dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioner to pursue the appropriate legal avenues for relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 21:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 330 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414549</link>
      <description>The court upheld the imposition of the penalty under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that the pendency of an appeal against the assessment order did not preclude initiating penalty proceedings. The court highlighted the availability of statutory remedies for challenging the penalty and dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioner to pursue the appropriate legal avenues for relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>