<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27065</link>
    <description>An application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 had to be presented in court in the manner required by the applicable court rule. Because the application was sent by post instead of being filed before the court, it did not comply with the prescribed mode of presentation. The High Court therefore treated it as not entertainable and dismissed it as not maintainable for failure to follow the mandatory procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:28:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 36 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27065</link>
      <description>An application under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 had to be presented in court in the manner required by the applicable court rule. Because the application was sent by post instead of being filed before the court, it did not comply with the prescribed mode of presentation. The High Court therefore treated it as not entertainable and dismissed it as not maintainable for failure to follow the mandatory procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>