<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 293 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414512</link>
    <description>Conviction for criminal breach of trust and cheating requires proof of more than entrustment or non-return of money; the prosecution must show dishonest misappropriation or conversion, and dishonest inducement or fraudulent intention at the inception of the transaction. The material described in the text did not establish that the accused misappropriated the funds, made any proved deposit or investment, or induced the complainant by deception when the money was advanced for a loan arrangement. On that basis, the ingredients of Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code were held not proved, and the appellate court&#039;s reversal of the trial conviction was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 293 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414512</link>
      <description>Conviction for criminal breach of trust and cheating requires proof of more than entrustment or non-return of money; the prosecution must show dishonest misappropriation or conversion, and dishonest inducement or fraudulent intention at the inception of the transaction. The material described in the text did not establish that the accused misappropriated the funds, made any proved deposit or investment, or induced the complainant by deception when the money was advanced for a loan arrangement. On that basis, the ingredients of Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code were held not proved, and the appellate court&#039;s reversal of the trial conviction was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>