https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298565 In a UAPA bail context, the court applied the statutory bar in section 43D(5) by examining whether the charge-sheet material disclosed prima facie true accusations under Chapters IV and VI. The investigation record, including witness statements, call transcripts and video material, was treated as sufficient at the bail stage to indicate training linked to a proscribed organisation, coordinated violent protests and disruption of public movement and supplies. The court reiterated that a meticulous appraisal of evidence is unnecessary at this stage, and rejected reliance on peaceful protest and free speech where the statutory threshold was otherwise met. Bail was refused and the prior order was upheld. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:00:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298565 In a UAPA bail context, the court applied the statutory bar in section 43D(5) by examining whether the charge-sheet material disclosed prima facie true accusations under Chapters IV and VI. The investigation record, including witness statements, call transcripts and video material, was treated as sufficient at the bail stage to indicate training linked to a proscribed organisation, coordinated violent protests and disruption of public movement and supplies. The court reiterated that a meticulous appraisal of evidence is unnecessary at this stage, and rejected reliance on peaceful protest and free speech where the statutory threshold was otherwise met. Bail was refused and the prior order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298565