<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 290 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414509</link>
    <description>The case involved determining the taxability of referral services procured by an Indian company from a US entity under the IGST Act. The applicant argued that the services did not qualify as an import of service and were not taxable in India. The ruling authority did not provide a ruling on the matter of tax liability as it was beyond their jurisdiction. The application was disposed of without a determination on the place of supply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 290 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414509</link>
      <description>The case involved determining the taxability of referral services procured by an Indian company from a US entity under the IGST Act. The applicant argued that the services did not qualify as an import of service and were not taxable in India. The ruling authority did not provide a ruling on the matter of tax liability as it was beyond their jurisdiction. The application was disposed of without a determination on the place of supply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>