<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 285 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the refund claim was valid as there was no need to file an appeal against the re-assessed Bills of Entry under Section 128 of the Customs Act. Both parties accepted the re-assessment, and the refund arose from this re-assessment without any dispute, making it permissible under the law. The Tribunal referenced relevant legal precedents and modified the order to grant consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:00:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 285 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the refund claim was valid as there was no need to file an appeal against the re-assessed Bills of Entry under Section 128 of the Customs Act. Both parties accepted the re-assessment, and the refund arose from this re-assessment without any dispute, making it permissible under the law. The Tribunal referenced relevant legal precedents and modified the order to grant consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>