<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 283 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order dated 28.05.2021, and directed the Adjudicating Authority to restore the application to its file, admit it, and proceed further in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized that the Adjudicating Authority should not have deferred the initiation of CIRP and should have admitted the application based on the evidence of default provided by the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 06:59:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 283 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order dated 28.05.2021, and directed the Adjudicating Authority to restore the application to its file, admit it, and proceed further in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized that the Adjudicating Authority should not have deferred the initiation of CIRP and should have admitted the application based on the evidence of default provided by the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>