<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1265 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298554</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi was allowed on the ground that the Commissioner (Appeals) did not consider the demand of duty amount ordered to be deposited. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. The Tribunal clarified that the interference was limited to the respondents only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 18:20:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1265 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298554</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi was allowed on the ground that the Commissioner (Appeals) did not consider the demand of duty amount ordered to be deposited. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. The Tribunal clarified that the interference was limited to the respondents only.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>