<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 266 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414485</link>
    <description>The Authority held that it lacked jurisdiction to decide on the surrender of GST registration as it does not fall under Advance Ruling provisions. Input Tax Credit (ITC) on major repairs was disallowed to the extent of capitalization under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act. However, the society was allowed to claim proportionate ITC on input services despite availing exemptions for residential units as per Section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 266 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414485</link>
      <description>The Authority held that it lacked jurisdiction to decide on the surrender of GST registration as it does not fall under Advance Ruling provisions. Input Tax Credit (ITC) on major repairs was disallowed to the extent of capitalization under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act. However, the society was allowed to claim proportionate ITC on input services despite availing exemptions for residential units as per Section 17(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>