<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 252 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , ALLAHABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414471</link>
    <description>Complete consent affidavits from all equity shareholders, secured creditors and unsecured creditors of both the transferor and transferee companies justified dispensing with separate meetings for the proposed amalgamation scheme. The Tribunal found that the supporting board resolutions and audited and provisional financial statements satisfied the statutory prerequisites for considering the application, and that convening stakeholder meetings would serve no useful purpose where unanimous consent was already on record. The application was therefore allowed in terms of the directions issued, and the meetings of the equity shareholders, secured creditors and unsecured creditors of both companies were dispensed with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:31:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 252 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , ALLAHABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414471</link>
      <description>Complete consent affidavits from all equity shareholders, secured creditors and unsecured creditors of both the transferor and transferee companies justified dispensing with separate meetings for the proposed amalgamation scheme. The Tribunal found that the supporting board resolutions and audited and provisional financial statements satisfied the statutory prerequisites for considering the application, and that convening stakeholder meetings would serve no useful purpose where unanimous consent was already on record. The application was therefore allowed in terms of the directions issued, and the meetings of the equity shareholders, secured creditors and unsecured creditors of both companies were dispensed with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>