<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 233 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414452</link>
    <description>The Court denied the petitioner&#039;s request for anticipatory bail in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The decision was based on the seriousness of the allegations, the necessity of custodial interrogation to uncover additional laundered funds, and the lack of evidence supporting the petitioner&#039;s innocence or non-involvement in future offenses while on bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:30:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 233 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414452</link>
      <description>The Court denied the petitioner&#039;s request for anticipatory bail in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The decision was based on the seriousness of the allegations, the necessity of custodial interrogation to uncover additional laundered funds, and the lack of evidence supporting the petitioner&#039;s innocence or non-involvement in future offenses while on bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>