https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298543 The Gujarat High Court considered whether time for payment of the balance auction price could be extended under Rule 9(4) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 and whether protection could be granted against the VAT Department's charge under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act. The matter was adjourned for further hearing, and the State was directed to take instructions in the meantime. en-us Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:29:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298543 The Gujarat High Court considered whether time for payment of the balance auction price could be extended under Rule 9(4) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 and whether protection could be granted against the VAT Department's charge under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act. The matter was adjourned for further hearing, and the State was directed to take instructions in the meantime. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298543