<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1286 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298542</link>
    <description>Auction sale of secured property was stated to require completion within 90 days after the petitioner bank identified a prospective buyer following repeated unsuccessful auction attempts. The bank submitted that delay could make it difficult to secure the buyer again and that two sets of the petition had been filed with the registry. The office was directed to list the matter before the appropriate Division Bench on 11 December 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1286 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298542</link>
      <description>Auction sale of secured property was stated to require completion within 90 days after the petitioner bank identified a prospective buyer following repeated unsuccessful auction attempts. The bank submitted that delay could make it difficult to secure the buyer again and that two sets of the petition had been filed with the registry. The office was directed to list the matter before the appropriate Division Bench on 11 December 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>