<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1466 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298540</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the registration could not be cancelled solely based on exceeding the monetary limit set by the amendment. The Court emphasized that the Board&#039;s activities were genuine and aligned with its objects, finding no grounds for cancellation under Section 12AA(3) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1466 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298540</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the registration could not be cancelled solely based on exceeding the monetary limit set by the amendment. The Court emphasized that the Board&#039;s activities were genuine and aligned with its objects, finding no grounds for cancellation under Section 12AA(3) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>