https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298545 Provisional release of confiscated prohibited goods was allowed despite departmental notifications declaring the goods prohibited from a specified date; an order under Section 125 was noted as the statutory mechanism for confiscation but confiscation was stayed and goods were permitted provisional release on the same conditional terms applied in other cases. The controversy over a subsequent executive notification affecting the status of the goods was recorded, but the operative effect was preservation of provisional release pending resolution of the notifications and related proceedings. en-us Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298545 Provisional release of confiscated prohibited goods was allowed despite departmental notifications declaring the goods prohibited from a specified date; an order under Section 125 was noted as the statutory mechanism for confiscation but confiscation was stayed and goods were permitted provisional release on the same conditional terms applied in other cases. The controversy over a subsequent executive notification affecting the status of the goods was recorded, but the operative effect was preservation of provisional release pending resolution of the notifications and related proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298545