<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1911 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298530</link>
    <description>An earlier order appointing a liquidator was modified because the appointed liquidator expressed inability to continue due to pre-occupation and requested relief from appointment. Applying Rule 154(2) of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, the tribunal relieved the first liquidator and substituted another liquidator from the approved panel. The remaining terms of the earlier order were left unchanged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:11:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1911 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298530</link>
      <description>An earlier order appointing a liquidator was modified because the appointed liquidator expressed inability to continue due to pre-occupation and requested relief from appointment. Applying Rule 154(2) of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, the tribunal relieved the first liquidator and substituted another liquidator from the approved panel. The remaining terms of the earlier order were left unchanged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>