<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2093 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenditure by the CIT(A) due to lack of evidence of business activity. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the notional disallowance of interest expenditure, finding it unjustified based on available reserves and legal precedents. The appeal was partly allowed, with the disallowance on interest expenditure being ordered to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:11:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2093 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of expenditure by the CIT(A) due to lack of evidence of business activity. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the notional disallowance of interest expenditure, finding it unjustified based on available reserves and legal precedents. The appeal was partly allowed, with the disallowance on interest expenditure being ordered to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>