https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414447 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, which imposed a penalty for alleged suppression of turnover and tax evasion. The court held that disputed questions of fact should not be entertained under writ jurisdiction, and the petitioner's contentions lacked merit. The petitioner's claim of no appellate remedy available against another decision was also rejected as it could be appealed under Section 107, making it not maintainable for review under Article 226. The court emphasized exhausting statutory remedies before seeking relief under Article 226. en-us Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414447 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, which imposed a penalty for alleged suppression of turnover and tax evasion. The court held that disputed questions of fact should not be entertained under writ jurisdiction, and the petitioner's contentions lacked merit. The petitioner's claim of no appellate remedy available against another decision was also rejected as it could be appealed under Section 107, making it not maintainable for review under Article 226. The court emphasized exhausting statutory remedies before seeking relief under Article 226. Case-Laws GST Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414447